|
The diagram also takes into
account more current phenomena such as globalisation which, as we
explain later on, acquire importance in explaining the linguistic
uses of young people. Therefore, through the social changes involved
in globalisation (new forms of relationships, immigration, new linguistic
offer, etc.) the linguistic uses of young people are affected.
We should point out that the linguistics uses considered
here are set within the Catalan reality. In this sense, our prevailing
interest is the use of Catalan and the use of Spanish. This is specified
in young people who when they speak in any area or with any person
use exclusively or mainly Catalan - to whom we refer as young Catalan
speakers; young people who use Spanish exclusively or mainly -to
whom we refer as young Spanish speakers, and young people who use
both languages in differing degrees -young bilingual speakers. Therefore,
it is in this sense that in this text we use the concepts of Catalan
speakers and Spanish speakers, always referring to the use of one
language or another.
4.
The quantitative analysis: application of the logit model(9)
The application of multi-variables techniques, in this case, hopes
to account for what varies beyond the simple description of the
date of the 2002 Survey on young people. The aim of applying the
logit model is to identify the relationship between a dependent
variable, linguistic uses of young people aged between 15 and 29,
explained by a series of independent variables.
The logit model is used when a causality relationship is considered.
A variable is considered to be dependent and is explained by the
rest of variables that are independent. The multinomial logit model
(10) in question has the language of young Catalan people
as dependent variable. In a multinomial logit model only the significant
associations in which the response variable intervenes without the
interaction of the explanatory variables is taken into account.
Therefore, this technique is highly useful for explanatory models
as when an influence is defined, it is not affected by the influence
of the other variables of the model.
Finally, to have a more complete model, two applications were made:
in the first, the variable to be explained was the family language,
and in the second, the variable to be explained was the habitual
language. This article shows global conclusions. The synthesis variables
included in the models are:(11)
- Habitual language and family language
-
Place of residence of the person interviewed
-
Origin of the parents (synthesis of the father's
place of birth and of the mother's place of birth)
-
Level of studies of the person interviewed
- Level of studies of the parents (synthesis of the father's level
of studies and of the mother's level of studies)
- Use of ICTs (in the results the use of ICT is eliminated by
the other influences)
-
Current membership of associations
Description of the results of the variables included in the analysis
The main results of these variables show that half young Catalan
people have Spanish or mainly Spanish as their family language (49.6),
42.3% have Catalan or mainly Catalan as their family language and
7.1% speak both languages. As far as habitual language is concerned,
42% of the young people say they habitually use Spanish (only or
mainly), 43.7% Catalan and 13.7% both languages.
In addition, in the 2002 Survey on young people they were asked for
their linguistic uses in other areas (see table 2). Overall, the
uses of Catalan are more frequent at work/secondary school and when
writing. Bilingual uses occur more frequently at work/secondary
school and with strangers and the use of Spanish occurs more frequently
in the family. It should be mentioned that the family is the area
that is least bilingual and the area of friends is very bilingual.
Table 2. Language spoken by young people
in the various areas and written language
Language |
Habitually |
With the family |
With friends |
Work/
Sec. school
|
With strangers
|
For writing |
Catalan |
38,9 |
40,6 |
32,8 |
41,4 |
38,8 |
42,3 |
More Catalan than Spanish |
4,8 |
1,7 |
5,8 |
8,4 |
2,8 |
3,6 |
Both in Catalan and in Spanish |
13,7 |
7,1 |
17,9 |
21,1 |
21,1 |
10,0 |
More Spanish than Catalan |
6,3 |
1,7 |
7,1 |
6,9 |
2,6 |
4,8 |
Spanish |
35,7 |
47,9 |
36,0 |
21,6 |
33,5 |
38,6 |
Others languages |
0,7 |
1,1 |
0,5 |
0,7 |
0,2 |
0,7 |
Does not know / No answer |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
0,0 |
1,1 |
0,0 |
Source: 2002 Survey on Young People of Catalonia General Secretariat
for Youth
As far as the place of residence of the young people is concerned,
44.7% are from the metropolitan area, 22.5% live in Barcelona city
and 32.9% in the rest of Catalonia. With regard to the level of
studies of the person interviewed, it should be taken into consideration
that many members of the group of young people are currently studying
(45.4%). Of the rest, 21.9% have higher qualifications, 19.9% elementary
studies and 11.8 medium level studies.
With regard to the parents of the people interviewed, we should point
out the greater frequency of young people with parents both of whom
were born in Catalonia (39.4%), in second place, young people with
parents both of whom were born in another part of Spain (31.8%),
and in third place mixed couples, in other words, one of the members
born in Catalonia and the other in another part of Spain (25.1%).
With regard to the level of studies, most of the parents are couples
without studies or with elementary studies (55.7%), in 22.7% of
cases one of the members of the couple has higher qualifications
and in 18.8% of cases, one of them has medium level studies and
the other has elementary studies, or they both have medium level
studies.
Finally, it should be mentioned that 44.5% of young people are members
of some kind of club or association. The most frequent ones are
sports clubs. On the other hand, the use of new information and
communication technologies created variable indicates that 53.2%
of young people use 2 or more ICTs—such as mobile phone, computer
or Internet.
Description of the results of applying the logit model
Below we describe the conclusions of applying the two logit
models: one in which the response variable (variable to be explained
by the model) is the family language and another in which the response
language is the usual language. We thus aim to construct a more
overall model.(12)
In the first place, it should be said that in both analyses (family
language and habitual language) the model adapts to the data in
a satisfactory way.(13)
in addition, there are no relationships of more than two
variables, therefore, the effects that are described are concerned
with the relationship between the two variables that control the
rest; they are direct effects and there are no combinations of two
or more variables that influence the response variables. This kind
of analysis accounts for the influence of one category of the independent
variable (place of residence, origin of the parents, level of studies,
etc.) on a category of the dependent variable or to be explained
(family language and habitual language). In other words, that it
shows how belonging to one category or to another influences the
predisposition of having Catalan, Spanish or both languages as a
habitual language.
The following diagram shows the results of both analyses in a graphic
way. The black arrows indicate the influence and the direction it
takes; the thickness of the arrows indicates the intensity of the
influence. The green dotted lines show the influences that have
been explored with complimentary analyses but which are not part
of the logit model because it only takes into account the influences
directed at the dependent variable (family language and habitual
language).
Logit model diagram (variables that influence linguistic uses)
With regard to the model in which the dependent variable is the
family language, we should state that the analysis confirms the
hypothesis in which family language is explained by the origin of
the parents in the first place, the educational level of the family
nucleus in second place, and the educational level of the young
person in third place. The strongest influence is the family origin.
This means that, when the place of birth of the parents is outside
Catalonia, Spanish prevails in linguistic use in the family; when
the parents were born in Catalunya, Catalan prevails as the linguistic
use in the family. This trend is also influenced by the level of
studies of the parents and of the people interviewed. Thus, the
higher the level of studies in the family linguistics uses, the
greater the use of the Catalan language. Below you will see a table
summarising the results of the application of the logit model for
family language:
Summary of the results of the logit model family language
Id. |
Interaction |
µ |
41 |
Family lang. = Catalan *Level of studies
= Medium |
0,6757 |
61 |
Family lang. = Catalan *Level of studies
parents =None or elementary |
-0,758 |
44 |
Family lang. = Catalan and Spanish *Level
of studies = Elementary |
-0,7587 |
38 |
Family lang. = Catalan and Spanish equally |
-1,0839 |
53 |
Family lang. = Catalan *Parents' place of
birth = Sp-Sp |
-2,6368 |
56 |
Family lang. = Catalan and Spanish *Parents'
place of birth = Sp-Sp |
-2,1122 |
- The identifier corresponds to the number assigned to the interaction.
The interaction is the combination of categories of the independent
variables with the dependent one.
- µ is the value of the parameter obtained from the logit
model proposed
The absolute value of the parameters indicates the intensity of the
association. Therefore, it is observed that the most intensive effect
is that of parameter 53 and 56 corresponding to the family language
and origin of the parents effect. In other words, there are differences
in the family language depending on the place of birth of the parents.
In the model in which the response variable is the
habitual language, the family language is the one that determines,
to a great degree, the habitual language of the person interviewed.
Far behind this, the level of studies, the place of residence and
membership of associations determines the habitual language. In
addition, according to the resulting model, the variable that determines
a frequency of ICT uses remains outside the model as, although it
has an influence on the habitual language, this influence comes
from its relationship with the level of studies and not on its own.
Below you will see a table summarising the results of the application
of the logit model for habitual language:
Summary of the results of the logit model
habitual language
Id. |
Interaction |
µ |
82 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan*Family language
= Catalan |
5,9285 |
86 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan and Spanish *Family
language = Catalan and Spanish |
2,8995 |
85 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan and Spanish *Family
language = Catalan |
2,7605 |
83 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan *Family language
= Catalan and Spanish |
2,6685 |
93 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan *Level of studies
= Higher |
0,6788 |
97 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan and Spanish *Level
of studies = Higher |
0,4087 |
103 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan *Territory = Barcelona |
-0,5954 |
92 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan *Level of studies
= Medium |
-0,6151 |
76 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan *Membership of associations
= not associated |
-0,6566 |
95 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan and Spanish *Level
of studies = Elementary |
-0,6998 |
107 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan and Spanish *Territory
= Metropolitan area |
-0,8521 |
73 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan |
-0,935 |
91 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan *Level of studies
= Elementary |
-1,041 |
74 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan and Spanish |
-1,237 |
104 |
Habitual lang. = Catalan *Territory = Metropolitan
area |
-1,8485 |
In this case, it is observed that the most intense
effect is that of parameters 82, 86, 85 and 83 corresponding to
the effect of habitual language and family language. In other words,
that there are differences in the habitual language depending on
the family language. The four significant parameters have a positive
sign and indicate that when the family language is Catalan, the
willingness of young people to use Catalan habitually is greater
(parameter 82). At the same time, we should mention the fact that
young people whose family language is Catalan and Spanish are more
likely to have Catalan rather than Spanish as their habitual language
(parameter 83).
|