In particular, consideration of
style as a symbol raises the question of semantic relations between equivalents or
synonyms. Thus, according to a restrictive view of semantics as the study, exclusively, of
the logical-referential component, synonyms involve identity of basic or denotative
meaning, as observable across putatively synonymous pairs of words or expressions. From
this point of view, the values of elements in synonymous pairs can be relegated to the
fringe area of connotative meaning, of subjectivity and context of use. And the latter can
be understood as nebulous and nameless, or at least not removed from the epistemological
framework of general linguistics.
seen form this standpoint, would seem to be about impressionistic labelling of nuanced
distinctions of secondary importance. The arrival of pragmalinguistics on the scene,
however, has made it possible to increase systematisation of contextual factors.
Furthermore, the development of a wider range (a more pragmatic range, if you will)
of semantic issues, such as Language Argumentation Theory (LAT) proposed initially by
Ducrot, facilitates consideration of many such values (distinctions and nuances) that were
originally considered residual. These latter form a part of language as elements which
have come to be conventionalised in the structures of the language. Many synonymous pairs
thus cease to be such, as linguistic research makes it possible to establish explicitly
the semantico-pragmatic differences between apparent synonyms (or, more euphemistically,
"almost synonyms"). These become linguistic units differentiated via the
inclusion of pragmatic specifications (for example, in relation to requirements of
indirect speech acts or politeness), or alternatively through the emergence of
connotative meaning in terms of structural factors (for example, the suffusing of lexical
units with associated axiological points of view).
times, progress in differentiating synonymous lexical units stems from the rigorous study
of contexts of use and of correlation existing between linguistic variation and social
variation. As we have seen, variation sociolinguistics, on the one hand, and studies of
systemic functionalism exploring the notion of register, on the other, clearly underpin
the functionalisation of stylistics -and the associated narrowing of the concept of
synonymy. There is no need to repeat here the well-known anecdote reported years ago by
Martin Joos: as soon as there is more than one clock at the same train station, the forces
of specialisation begin to operate. Indeed, if the clocks were to show exactly the same
time, why have more than one?
Viewed in this
way, stylistics that emphasise the symbolic can be seen to push back the barrier of
(socio)linguistic entropy. It reclaims certain areas assigned traditionally to free
variation, converting them into territory governed by patterns of variation and
susceptible to systematic description. In the next section, we shall be looking at some of
the most promising stylistics issues from this perspective.
Some objects for the application of stylistics
Let us go on
to consider, by way of illustration, the stylistics of some structures of the language:
phraseological combinations, the infusing of socio cognitive bias in the lexis, and the
mechanisms of semantic nominalisations.
As regards the
first, note that phraseology is today an attractive area for linguists, especially in
application to contrastive lexicography and translation (Corpas 1998). After a stage when
it was de rigeur to evaluate linguistic creativity and free or open choice,
emphasis came to be placed more on the way speakers used "prefabricated" pieces
of discourse. The literary use of fashionable phrases and clichés has received attention
from scholars of stylistics, often in the context of originality of manipulation
(reorganisation) or breaking with tradition as a resource for
"de-familiarisation". However, stylistic analysis is not averse to looking at
routines and "routinisation" which facilitate production and interpretation of
discourse, in accordance with the patterns of each register or each genre.
There is a
phraseology that is characteristic of legal discourse, of administrative documents, of
scientific articles, literary criticism, news reports, electioneering, tele evangelism,
radio talk shows and even Internet chats. Such phraseological practice (which often
involves mere word collocations that occur habitually and which today corpus
linguistics can help us to study on a more empirical basis) foment a degree of productive
and interpretative automatism and facilitate the immediate identification of registers and
genres. Its power as a mechanism for reproduction of ideologies is simply remarkable,
especially in the way it contributes to "naturalise" discourse, making it more
difficult to assume a critical position. There is nothing new in this, the sayer of
proverbs has functioned in this way for centuries (often a proverb or saying is simply an ideologeme
that adopts the seductive form of the trope). The decreased visibility suffered today by
such routinised forms actually increases their ideological effectiveness in the discourse
of contemporary mass media.
instance is the analysis of sociocognitive biases of the lexicon -axiological points of
view, as we have said, that have become conventionalised over time within a cultural and
linguistic community, which have finally crystallised in the very structures of the
language. From the perspective of language argumentation theory, subsequently developed
into topoi theory, what is relevant is the fact that many lexical units so to speak
impose a point of view on speakers, be it euphoric or otherwise (non-euphoric) (Raccah
2000). Thus, to speak of "xafagor" (burning shame, embarrassment) and even more
so the Spanish equivalent "bochorno" (ditto) which have a literal meteorological
meaning (sultry, hot and close), and a metaphorical projection, "balafiar"
(squander, waste), "emigrant" (emigrant) or "terrorisme" (terrorism), implies
an inseparable axiological content, inherent in these linguistic units. In the same
way, "warm", "investment", "tourism" or "struggle for
independence" inevitably convey more or less euphoric points of view. Similarly, on a
scale of values, "danger" clearly rates as "non-euphoric"), while the
near-synonym "risk" is clearly less so, and even in certain contexts (in some
Christian theology, for example) may become euphoric. Commercial advertising and political
propaganda have taken careful note of all this, obviously enough. What should be
underlined here is that the built-in bias is inevitable once the speaker / writer has
selected the item in question as a consequence of a stylistic option. It should not be
forgotten that this choice is conditioned by socio-discursive inertia, by an acquired habitus.
And, reciprocally, the receiver (listener, reader) has to counteract this inertia if he or
she wishes to be free to carry out an interpretative criticism of the discourse.
illustration that we propose is that of nominal-heavy or nominalised style (Salvador
2000). Here the alternatives set up are between the expression of processes (and
qualities) by means of sentence-level constructions which contain verbs (and, often,
adjectives) or alternatively by means of nominals where the information is reduced and
made compact. As such, the latter makes it possible to perceive processes or qualities as
entities or wholes. Thus, speaking of "illegal adoptions", "masculine
beauty", "a catastrophic seismic movement" or "health and
illness", constitutes alternative stylistic options selected in the place of other
(roughly) similar ways of referring to the same content by means of whole sentences. Such
sentences are normally very exact, with particular shades of meaning: "children that
one adopts/ one has adopted/one will adopt, thus breaking the law";
"The/some/these/ men are/have been/will become/seem beautiful"; and so forth. It
should be noted, in any case, that a variety of different sentential expressions can be
found to correspond to nominalised expressions.
the nominals options are more "economical" and facilitate the creation of
taxonomies associated with specialist discourse, or at least a formal register with a
certain degree of opaqueness, by means of processes of "terminologisation"
that are very relevant to sociocognitive approaches. In the same way, opting for this
synthetic expression makes for more rapid or smooth advance in the thematic progression of
a text, thanks to the anaphoric function: "Yesterday a Panam aircraft fell into the
ocean.... The accident had...").
Now of course,
side by side with these advantages in economic expression, nominalisation clearly plays
its part in reducing information: information on the weather, place or the participants,
as well as factors of modalisation, which, once concisely packed into a nominal expression
are not easily recoverable. Also observable is the effect of presenting concrete processes
as abstract entities. The ideological importance is considerable, in the manipulation of
processed information, particularly noticeable in the case of certain types of anaphor
which give a strong interpretative bias to the discourse ("The demonstrators noisily
crossed the quadrangle... Their bursting on the scene/invasion / intrusion brought
this overview of work on stylistics and its function in the ambit of language sciences, we
can briefly and succinctly point out certain trends and orientations within the
discipline, while not in any way claiming to be exhaustive: a) it goes beyond
literature, without ignoring such institutionalised discourse patterns; b) it is
situated in the language framework, where structures allow variation which becomes
functionalised and filled out with individual/social meaning; c) consequently, the
amount of observable free variation is reduced, with the increased systematisation of
determining factors, in terms of registers and genres on the one hand and stylistics on
the other; d) contributions from pragmalinguistics and discourse analysis are
crucial to defining the diversity of expressive styles and the sociolinguistic and
ideological relevance of stylistic options.
ADAM, J. M. Le
style dans la langue. Une reconception de la stylistique. Lausanne: Delachax et
BIBER, D. et
al. Corpus linguistics. Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge:
"Criterios generales de clasificación del universo fraseológico de las lenguas, con
ejemplos en español y en inglés". In: ALVAR, M.; CORPAS, G. (eds.) Diccionarios,
frases, palabras. Malaga: Universidad de Malaga, p. 1591-87.
ENKVIST, N. E.
"Text and discourse linguistics, rhetoric, and stylistics". In: VAN DIJK, T. A.
(ed.) Discourse and literature. New approaches to the analysis of literary genres.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins,1985, p. 11-38
MEDINA, J. Estilo y texto en la lengua. Madrid: Gredos, 1997.
GARCÍA, A. "La escuela española de lingüística y la pragmática", Caplletra
29, p.13-22, 2000.
MARCO, J. El
fil dAriadna. Anàlisi estilística i traducció literària. Vic: Eumo, 2002.
MARTIN, J. R. English
text. System and structure. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1992.
MARTIN, J. R.
"Cohesion and texture". In: SCHIFFRIN, D. et al. (eds.), The Handbook
of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
ALTURO, N. (eds.) Corpus oral de conversa col·loquial. Materials de treball. Barcelona:
Universitat de Barcelona, 2002.
RACCAH, P. Y.
"Un top, sinon rien". In: SALVADOR, V.; PIQUER, A. (eds.) El discurs
prefabricat. Estudis de fraseologia teòrica i aplicada. Castelló: UJI, 2000, p.
"Lestil nominalitzat", Caplletra 29, 2000, p. 69-82.
SALVADOR, V. Els
arxius del discurs. Barcelona: P.A.M, 2000.
VAN DIJK, T.
A. "Critical Discourse Analysis as a method for the research in social
sciences". A: WODAK, R.; MEYER, M. (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis.
London: Sager, 2001, chap. 6.
VAN DIJK, T.
A. Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage, 1998.
Universitat Jaume I